If you have entered a URI make sure that it is available on-line using, for example, Vapour
Also make sure that your ontology RDF or OWL code is correct using an RDF validator as http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
If the URI and the ontology are correct but OOPS! is not able to analyze it, please,
let us know by email (oops(at)delicias.dia.fi.upm.es) attaching the file or indicating the ontology URI and
we will find out what was wrong within OOPS!.
Lexicalizing Ontologies: The issues behind the labels. In Multimodal communication in the 21st century: Professional and academic challenges. 33rd Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA), XXXIII AESLA.
Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.
Evaluation of Taxonomic Knowledge in Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Proceedings of the Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. Alberta, Canada.
Style guidelines for naming and labeling ontologies in the multilingual web.
Ontology Evaluation. PhD thesis.
Ontology evaluation. In Handbook on ontologies, pages 251-273. Springer.
Owl pizzas: Practical experience of teaching owl-dl: Common errors & common patterns. In Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web, pages 63-81. Springer.
Weaving the pedantic web. In Proceedings of the WWW2010 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, LDOW 2010, Raleigh, USA, April 27, 2010.
D7. 1.3-study on persistent URIs, with identification of best practices and recommendations on the topic for the Mss and the EC. PwC EU Services.
“Linked Data - Design issues”. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool, 1st edition.
Is your linked data vocabulary 5-star?. http://bvatant.blogspot.fr/2012/02/is-your-linked-data-vocabulary-5-star_9588.html
Enter your ontology to scan: